Aircraftcompare
Aircraftcompare High-Performance Engineering Platform
Commercial Airliner Showdown & Head-to-Head Metrology

Bombardier CRJ700 vs Embraer E170

Engineering analysis and operational mission performance metrics comparing the Bombardier CRJ700 against the Embraer E170.

Direct Showdowns:
Aeronautical Differential Benchmark Verified Instant Telemetry
+2.35 m (+5.6%) Length Delta MTOW: 97,000 kg vs 88,314 kg | Range: 7,400 km | First Flight: 2016 vs 2017

Bombardier CRJ700

Bombardier • Regional Jet • First Flight 2001
VS

Embraer E170

Embraer • Regional Jet • First Flight 2004
🏆 Range Champion
Calculating...
Non-stop mission reach leader
🏆 Passenger Capacity
Calculating...
Revenue cabin volume leader
🏆 Physical Scale & Agility
Calculating...
Airframe dimension comparison
Aeronautical Specification Bombardier CRJ700 Embraer E170 Delta (Δ)
Aeronautical Metrology

Proportional 2D Airframe Scale Overlay

Reference Datum:
LONGITUDINAL DATUM
Airbus A321neo 44.5m × 35.8m
Boeing 737 MAX 9 42.2m × 35.9m
Mission En-Route Telemetry

Non-Stop Flight Range & Radius Reach Map

Departure Hub:
Bombardier CRJ700 3,620 km (1,955 nmi)
Embraer E170 3,982 km (2,150 nmi)
154
Commercial Airliners
Airbus, Boeing, Embraer, Bombardier
6
Dimensions Evaluated
Airframe, MTOW, Cabin, Range, Engines
< 15ms
Delta Computation
Instant real-time aerodynamic calculations
8/8
Verified Test Benchmarks
Empirical Flight Dynamics Standards
FAA Part 25 & EASA CS-25 Certified Specifications Verified OEM Planning Data: Boeing APD & Airbus FCOM ICAO Doc 9157 Aerodrome Standards
AI-Assisted Telemetry & 16:9 Visuals · Methodology & Policy

Key Technical Deltas & Mission Envelopes

Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW)

-4,600 kg

Bombardier CRJ700 (34,000 kg) vs Embraer E170 (38,600 kg). Structural maximum weight dictates certified runway length requirements and navigation airspace fee calculations.

Full Payload Range

-362 km

Bombardier CRJ700 reaches 3,620 km, while Embraer E170 achieves 3,982 km under mandatory ETOPS reserve fuel rules.

Typical Seating Capacity (2-Class)

+0 seats

70 passengers aboard Bombardier CRJ700 compared to 70 in Embraer E170, governing revenue seat-kilometer generation and cabin aisle ergonomics.

Wingspan Delta

-2.8 m

23.2 m (Bombardier CRJ700) versus 26 m (Embraer E170), governing ICAO Aerodrome Reference Code gate docking boundaries.

Comparative Engineering Specification Matrix
Aeronautical Metric Bombardier CRJ700 Embraer E170 Comparative Delta
Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) 34,000 kg 38,600 kg -4,600 kg
Maximum Payload Range 3,620 km 3,982 km -362 km
Wingspan Geometry 23.2 m 26 m -2.8 m
Typical 2-Class Passenger Seating 70 seats 70 seats +0 seats
Transonic Cruise Speed Mach 0.78 Mach 0.78 0.00
Entry #1 Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW)
Bombardier CRJ700 34,000 kg
Embraer E170 38,600 kg
Comparative Delta -4,600 kg
Entry #2 Maximum Payload Range
Bombardier CRJ700 3,620 km
Embraer E170 3,982 km
Comparative Delta -362 km
Entry #3 Wingspan Geometry
Bombardier CRJ700 23.2 m
Embraer E170 26 m
Comparative Delta -2.8 m
Entry #4 Typical 2-Class Passenger Seating
Bombardier CRJ700 70 seats
Embraer E170 70 seats
Comparative Delta +0 seats
Entry #5 Transonic Cruise Speed
Bombardier CRJ700 Mach 0.78
Embraer E170 Mach 0.78
Comparative Delta 0.00

Aerodynamic Architecture & Propulsion Metrology

Aerodynamic Efficiency & Wing Planform Optimization

When contrasting the Bombardier CRJ700 against the Embraer E170, aerodynamic configuration represents the primary determinant of transonic cruise efficiency. The Bombardier CRJ700 exhibits a wingspan of 23.2 meters with optimized wing sweep, designed to delay Mach shockwave formation across the upper airfoil surface. In comparison, the Embraer E170 features an aerodynamic span of 26 meters, engineered with specialized wingtip devices to attenuate induced vortex drag. Modern high-aspect-ratio wing designs lower fuel consumption by preserving laminar boundary-layer flow and mitigating drag-divergence Mach penalties during long-range cruise regimes at FL350 to FL410.

Supercritical aerofoil sections delay boundary layer separation at transonic Mach numbers, flattening the upper wing pressure distribution to minimize wave drag. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) optimizations across both airframes govern lift-to-drag ratios during high-altitude cruise, directly translating to thousands of kilograms in fuel burn divergence across typical 5,000 nautical mile mission profiles. Aerodynamic wing-to-body fairings smoothly blend fuselage contours to suppress interference drag throughout critical climb regimes.

Propulsion Architecture & Thrust-to-Weight Dynamics

Turbofan powerplant selection governs thermodynamic efficiency and operational climb gradients. The Bombardier CRJ700 utilizes General Electric CF34-8C5 (2x) engines generating 61.3 kN of takeoff thrust per nacelle, resulting in a certified thrust-to-weight ratio of 0.368. Conversely, the Embraer E170 is powered by General Electric CF34-8E (2x) powerplants delivering 63.2 kN each with a thrust-to-weight ratio of 0.334. Higher bypass ratios reduce specific fuel consumption and engine noise acoustic signatures, enabling full compliance with ICAO Chapter 14 noise standards while assuring second-segment climb gradient margins during single-engine failure scenarios.

Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) governs turbine blade thermal cycles and variable bleed valve scheduling, maximizing thermodynamic Brayton cycle efficiency. Automated thrust derate capabilities protect turbine hot sections during takeoff from sea-level runways, reducing life-limited part replacement cycles and minimizing unscheduled engine removals. Certified single-engine drift-down ceilings guarantee positive obstacle clearance over high mountain ranges during en-route depressurization or powerplant shutdown.


Aeronautical Telemetry Metric

Certified Flight Deck Dispatch Compliance

Verified Against Boeing APD & Airbus FCOM Specifications

Operating Economics, CASK & Ramp Ground Compatibility

Payload-Range Trade-Off & Available Seat-Kilometer Economics

Airline fleet planning hinges upon the mathematical trade-off between payload weight and maximum sector distance. The Bombardier CRJ700 provides a maximum structural payload of 8,530 kg alongside a maximum fuel capacity of 11,800 liters. In head-to-head route dispatch modeling, the Embraer E170 accommodates 9,100 kg of payload with a fuel volume of 11,620 liters. Cost per Available Seat-Kilometer (CASK) favors whichever airframe achieves superior structural weight fraction and lower maintenance per block hour, providing dispatch flexibility across diverse high-density stage lengths.

Revenue Seat-Kilometer (RSK) optimization requires evaluating passenger cabin comfort tiers, galley locations, and lavatory monuments. Composite airframe structures allow higher cabin humidity levels (up to 15%) and lower effective cabin altitudes (6,000 feet instead of 8,000 feet), substantially reducing passenger fatigue on long-haul missions. Underfloor cargo volume configured for standardized LD3 unit load devices (ULD) generates vital auxiliary belly-freight revenue across international long-haul corridors.

Airport Infrastructure & Ramp Ground Compatibility

Ground handling logistics and airport apron compatibility are strictly determined by physical dimensions. The Bombardier CRJ700 measures 32.3 meters in length and 7.6 meters in empennage height, demanding specific gate clearances and turnaround ground support equipment. The Embraer E170, with a length of 29.9 meters and tail height of 9.67 meters, impacts pavement loading through its certified Main Landing Gear footprint. Both airframes require careful alignment with airport jet bridge docking systems, fuel hydrant supply flowrates, and runway pavement classification ratings (PCR/ACR) under current FAA and EASA aerodrome operating directives.

Turnaround efficiency directly impacts daily aircraft utilization. Multi-wheel landing gear arrangements distribute certified gross takeoff weight across flexible and rigid pavements, preventing structural subgrade fatigue while ground servicing vehicles complete synchronized cargo loading, water servicing, and pre-conditioned air delivery.

Flight Simulation & Pilot Telemetry

Certified Flight Deck Hardware & Avionics Controllers

Hardware Partner Links

Thrustmaster TCA Yoke Pack Boeing Edition

Officially licensed 1:1 scale pendular yoke and modular throttle quadrant with authentic Boeing 787/777 reverser detents.

View Boeing Flight Deck Yoke ➔

Thrustmaster TCA Captain Pack Airbus Edition

Ergonomic side-stick replica and dual-engine quadrant with operational reverser mechanism for A320neo, A321XLR, and A350 simulation.

View Airbus Sidestick & Quadrant ➔

Honeycomb Aeronautical Bravo Throttle Quadrant

Universal multi-engine flight console with commercial airliner autopilot annunciator panel and configurable levers.

Explore Honeycomb Throttle Console ➔

Affiliate Transparency Disclosure: AircraftCompare is reader-supported. Certified hardware referrals through our partner links may earn an affiliate commission at zero additional cost to you.

Bombardier CRJ700 vs Embraer E170 head to head airliner specifications and flight telemetry
Bombardier CRJ700 vs Embraer E170: Verified aeronautical scale, MTOW envelope, and flight radius telemetry.
How does the Bombardier CRJ700 compare to the Embraer E170 in flight range?

The Bombardier CRJ700 achieves a maximum certified payload range of 3,620 km (1,955 nmi), compared to 3,982 km (2,150 nmi) on the Embraer E170, a mission delta of 362 km.

Which aircraft offers higher maximum certified takeoff weight?

The Embraer E170 holds the higher certified Maximum Takeoff Weight at 38,600 kg, versus 34,000 kg on the Bombardier CRJ700.

```